Monday, August 28, 2006

on principles

When you're young, you hear older people talking about experiences they've had, lessons they've learnt. Often, you end up respecting these older folk for the lessons you perceive in these tales, for the principles that end up sticking in your mind. Principles that aren't just imparted to you with the expectation that you'll believe them, but principles that give you hope because of their nature: the fact that they're logically reasoned, and that the very logical reasoning they're based implies that your human mind has the power to produce, to create, to be extraordinary.

And then you grow older. You see the world doing things differently to what your reasoning says, and to what your principles reflect. You question the world's reasoning, and often find that there is no reasoning at all - the world does things because it isn't perfect, because perfect logic can only apply in a perfect world.

Some people try to get the world to adopt reasoning, but are crippled at every attempt to do so, because reasoning is for a theoretical world, and not the real world. Eventually, they end up adopting the world's way, because not doing so is much harder, perceived to be much less fruitful and ultimately pointless. The world is bigger than individual thought, it is said, and so they start believing that fighting the world's lack of reasoning is a waste of time.

Other people, also trying to get the world to adopt reasoning, end up differently. They understand that the world doesn't always reason, but stubbornly keep on trying to change individuals, and by implication the world. They refuse to accept that the world cannot be a place of reason, because the world is made up of individuals, and individuals have the ability to reason. Importantly, they keep the principles originally passed on to them close to their hearts, not because these principles remind them of the respect they have for those that taught them; but because each principle reminds them of their own ability to reason, to arrive at each principle in the first place. These people stick to what they believe is right in the face of others who gradually give up reason, saddened by the notion of a mind which justifies a loss of reason with gaining the ability to succeed in a world without it.

Today, I'm of the opinion that the world needs more principled individuals - not because of their principles, but because their ability to reason gives them the capability to make the world a logical place, one individual at a time.

Imagined on Monday, August 28, 2006

Comments [19]

Categorised as


 Thursday, August 24, 2006

probably

Following up on my previous ramblings, and in response to Dave's comment, I thought it polite to point out a very interesting piece of reading material to those that haven't been amazed by Scott Adams' thought patterns.

People say things like "yes, probably" and "in all probability" all the time. Do yourself a favour, read God's Debris (it's a free PDF dowload) once (or twice) - you'll probably never look at the concept of probability in the same way again...

Imagined on Thursday, August 24, 2006

Comments [10]

Categorised as  | 


 Thursday, August 10, 2006

theoretically

OK, so the guys in the office were having a debate about whether it's theoretically possible to predict lottery results.

My argument was that yes, it is. What I found interesting though is the example I used to justify my train of thought. Think about this:

Is it theoretically possible (ceteris paribus, naturally) to sink all the balls on a pool table from any given position with only one shot? Even if there were 1000 balls on a football stadium-sized table?

Imagined on Thursday, August 10, 2006

Comments [19]

Categorised as


 Wednesday, August 02, 2006

who are you?

This is that moment in the story. You know, the moment where the main character's thinking something along the lines of "OK, here we go..."

If you're reading this because you were curious about a newspaper advert, I suppose I need to sketch a little background first. My name is Martin, and this is my website. On it, you'll find a multitude of little snippets I've written over a period of two and a half years. I started writing on here to publish technical articles (I work in the software industry), but have always been intrigued by how much potential the internet holds for connecting people and their thoughts; that's why I quickly switched to writing about all sorts of experiences and personal viewpoints instead. I love the potential for discussion.

Earlier this year, I wrote an article (click to view) about a brief, chance encounter in a shop in Stellenbosch. I made a point of putting the experience down on proverbial paper because, although it seemed silly, I really thought "this is extraordinary". Because I have a habit of noticing small details, this nudging feeling I had fascinated me. It's still fascinating me - which is why I finally decided to give in to a suggestion to place the newspaper advert that lead you to this page, and why I'm writing this right now.

You see, I received a surprising amount of positive encouragement from friends, colleagues and even strangers to the three questions I asked:

  • Do I try to track her down?
  • How?
  • Why?

The dominant question I suppose is "why?". If you have a logical answer for me, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Fortunately, even though I'm generally someone who's partial to logic, something tells me that logic doesn't quite factor in here… My answer to the question is short: Why not? I guess it's that simple really, so there you have it!

If you're reading this, and you know that I'm talking about you, I guess I can ask the one question I wanted to ask really: What's your name?

(Verskoon asb die Engels, daar is baie mense wat maar sukkel met ons lieflike taal wat ek weet ook graag hierdie sou wou lees :-))

UPDATE: Because Peas on Toast and Cherryflava asked so nicely, here's the ad. Nothing fancy really, placed in the Eikestadnuus August 2nd edition.

Imagined on Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Comments [13]

Categorised as